Which perspective argues that legal protections for criminal suspects have been excessive and may compromise public safety?

The perspective that argues that legal protections for criminal suspects have been excessive and may compromise public safety is grounded in the crime control perspective. This viewpoint emphasizes the importance of maintaining order and ensuring swift and efficient justice responses to crime. Proponents of this perspective often assert that too many legal protections can hinder law enforcement's ability to prevent crime and apprehend offenders rapidly, potentially putting the broader community at risk.

On the other hand, the due process perspective prioritizes the rights of individuals in the legal system, advocating for fair treatment and justice for all suspects. It aims to ensure that legal safeguards are in place to protect against wrongful convictions, but its focus is on the rights of the accused rather than the implications for public safety. This contrast highlights why the assertion about excessive legal protections aligns more closely with the crime control perspective.

Restorative justice and rehabilitation perspectives focus on healing and integrating offenders back into society, emphasizing accountability and reducing recidivism rather than prioritizing public safety in the context of legal protections. Thus, the clear alignment of the crime control perspective with concerns about excessive protections and public safety makes it the correct answer.