In what circumstance would an appellate court typically become involved?

An appellate court typically becomes involved to review a verdict for possible legal errors. The primary function of appellate courts is to ensure that the law has been applied correctly in lower courts. They do not engage in re-examining factual evidence or hearing new evidence, as their review is based on the record from the trial court along with written briefs submitted by the parties. Appellate courts focus on whether legal principles were followed and whether the rights of the parties were protected during the trial.

The appellate process can involve scrutinizing aspects such as jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, and the application of laws relevant to the case. If an appellate court finds that a legal error adversely affected the outcome of a case, it may reverse the lower court's decision or remand the case for further proceedings.

In contrast, activities such as conducting jury selection or determining eligibility for probation are responsibilities of trial courts and are not within the purview of appellate courts. Appellate courts operate under the established legal records, ensuring a fair application of law rather than re-assessing factual determinations made by a jury.